Smoke and Mirrors: An Interview with Shasta Grant
by David Ebenbach Read the Story June 20, 2016
None of the characters in the story are named. Instead, they’ve mostly got kind of iconic titles—grandma, mother, father—and then the little girl is “her.” How did you arrive at nameless characters?
I wanted to raise the question of whether their relationships to each other are permanent or not. For the little girl in particular, I felt like her grandmother would refer to her as “my granddaughter” instead of using her name. “My granddaughter” conveys ownership and connection, both of which the grandmother is about to lose.
It’s also interesting to see that most of the conflict between characters is happening off stage—between the grandmother and the mother, between the grandmother and the father (her son). Yet it seems to me that those conflicts play out somewhat through the on-stage relationship, ostensibly loving, between the grandmother and grandchild. How did you decide what to focus on?
The idea of this story came from a friend’s photo on Facebook. It was a picture of her granddaughter at a playground. The story itself has nothing to do with this particular friend or her relationship to her granddaughter, but the image really stuck with me. It was kind of a run-down little playground, and I started thinking about a grandmother who spends her day taking her granddaughter to various playgrounds. I wanted the heart of the story to be those two driving around and playing, but the story needed some conflict as well. There needed to be some weight to the grandmother and granddaughter spending the day together, which is how the off-stage drama came to be.
How did you come to choose the title “Make-Believe”? Obviously it most directly refers to the pretend games the grandmother plays with her grandchild, but the grandmother is, I think, doing some bigger, deeper pretending in her life, particularly about her son. How did you come to a title that worked on both levels?
Credit for the title goes to Tara Laskowski (the editor of SLQ). The working title was “All The Things,” which I was never crazy about. When I finished revising the story, I sent a list of possible titles to Tara, none of which were very good, to be honest, and she suggested ”Make-Believe.” I immediately loved it because, as you say, it works on two levels.
What should a good short story do for (or to) the reader?
A great short story should break your heart. Or punch you in the gut. It should make the reader feel some emotion or connection. The best short stories are the ones you find yourself thinking about long after you’ve read them. They linger.
About the Author:
Shasta Grant is the 2016 SmokeLong Quarterly Kathy Fish Fellow. She won the 2015 Kenyon Review Short Fiction Contest and will be the Spring 2017 Writer-in-Residence at the Kerouac House. Her stories and essays have appeared in cream city review, Epiphany, WhiskeyPaper, wigleaf, and elsewhere. She has an MFA from Sarah Lawrence College and is Managing Editor of Storyscape Journal.
About the Interviewer:
David Ebenbach’s first poetry collection, We Were the People Who Moved, is forthcoming from Tebot Bach. He is also the author of two short fiction collections.
About the Artist:
A Best Small Fictions 2015 Winner, Dave Petraglia's writing and art have appeared in Bartleby Snopes, bohemianizm, Cheap Pop, Crack the Spine, Five:2:One, Gambling the Aisle, Hayden's Ferry, matchbook, Medium, McSweeney's, Necessary Fiction, North American Review, Per Contra, Points in Case, Popular Science, Razed, SmokeLong Quarterly, Up the Staircase, and others.